Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+interaction\:\s+10m\-40m\s+\(C36XR\)\,\s+12\/\/17m\s+\(WARC\s+2\/2\)\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] interaction: 10m-40m (C36XR), 12//17m (WARC 2/2) (score: 1)
Author: brunet@us.ibm.com (brunet@us.ibm.com)
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 11:10:29 -0500
Concerning destructive interaction between yagis, most of the what I have heard is interaction between 15 and 40 when one is over the other. The same frequency relationships don't seem to be found be
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00215.html (7,648 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] interaction: 10m-40m (C36XR), 12//17m (WARC 2/2) (score: 1)
Author: k2av@qsl.net (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 17:14:41 GMT
First, the only one who REALLY knows about a WARC 2/2 over a C36XR is Tom at Force 12. Send him an email. There's a reason for that...in general this combo question involves transmitting on 15 or 12
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00218.html (9,972 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] interaction: 10m-40m (C36XR), 12//17m (WARC 2/2) (score: 1)
Author: w9xx@iquest.net (Phil Howlett)
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 13:25:35 -0000
I have modeled a combination close to what you asked, a 3 el 12/17M duoband over a 2 el 40M, which is what I had wanted to put up. I found the 17M section was ruined by the 40M, even with extra ordin
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00219.html (9,084 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu