Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+ladders\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+ladders\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] ladders (score: 1): Author: Kevin Normoyle <knormoyle@surfnetusa.com>; Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 18:19:44 -0700; If you're 55+, using a ladder seems to have a lot of risk. http://apha.confex.com/apha/135am/recordingredirect.cgi/id/17261 (you can click on a pdf link there) in this study: (workplace fatalies) Rel; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00504.html (9,345 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] ladders (score: 1): Author: n8de@thepoint.net; Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 21:50:07 -0400; Comments inserted below: Mean is AVERAGE ... who climbs a 16 foot ladder? and who climbs a 29 foot ladder ? These stats seem quite ridiculous. I'm 73 ... The tallest ladder I own is 12 feet tall and; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00506.html (10,908 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] ladders (score: 1): Author: Kevin Normoyle <knormoyle@surfnetusa.com>; Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 19:51:09 -0700; my point is that a fixation on height having a correlation to risk is wrong. There are many things that introduce risk when you're in a possible fall situation. Height doesn't change the risk (once y; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00508.html (9,155 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] ladders (score: 1): Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>; Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 22:24:01 -0600; Thank you for your common sense view. Doug "Think of all the ways you can hurt yourself laughing." --Original Message-- my point is that a fixation on height having a correlation to risk is wrong. Th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00515.html (9,832 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] ladders (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 05:48:20 -0700; If you're 55+, using a ladder seems to have a lot of risk. http://apha.confex.com/apha/135am/recordingredirect.cgi/id/17261 (you can click on a pdf link there) in this study: (workplace fatalies) Rel; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00518.html (8,062 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] ladders (score: 1): Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 05:54:32 -0700; Interestingly, a couple months back there was a big NASA ladder safety thing.. ladder related injuries are the leading cause of accidents or something like that. One of the interesting aspects was th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00519.html (9,382 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] ladders (score: 1): Author: "AA6DX - Mark" <aa6dx@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 19:43:25 +0100; Well, not to long ago, I fell off of a 40' ladder, and was not injured in the least. Fortunately, I was on the 3rd rung up when I slipped. Seriously, I cannot believe that for several years in the 60; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00527.html (10,969 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]