Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+let\'s\s+get\s+back\s+on\s+track\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] let's get back on track (score: 1)
Author: wmunro@lava.net (warren munro)
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 07:40:55 -1000
hey guys and gals, let's get back on track !! leave the endless jokes and political tirades to some other reflector !! 73, Warren KH6WM -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Subm
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-01/msg00136.html (7,103 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] let's get back on track (score: 1)
Author: wa2moe@doitnow.com (Stu Greene)
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 1998 10:45:14 -0700
who appointed you as chief censor and master of the reflector? -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQU
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-01/msg00137.html (7,330 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] let's get back on track (score: 1)
Author: w7why@mail.coos.or.us (Tom Osborne)
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 1998 19:13:54 +0800
C'mon, lighten up. I enjoy a little humor once in a while. It's not done all that often. Better than 55 postings about WD-40 Tom W7WHY -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submi
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-01/msg00139.html (7,376 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] let's get back on track (score: 1)
Author: grimm@lynchburg.net (Kenneth D. Grimm)
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 1998 14:16:16 -0500
Ease off a bit Stu. No one appointed anyone anything. What Warren did was very appropriate. I read his comments as encouragement for those who are not engaged in "TowerTalk" to take their ideas to a
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-01/msg00140.html (7,702 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu