Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+lightning\s+standards\s+\(changes\)\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] lightning standards (changes) (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 08:59:16 -0700
There were some questions about how and why the standards change. Here's a link to an example of what goes on in the standards update process: http://www.nfpa.org/Assets/Files/PDF/ROP/780-A2007-ROP.p
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg01106.html (7,524 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] lightning standards (changes) (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 12:34:25 -0400
I remember that several years ago an alternative theory was making the rounds for tower protection. Its basis was to have the tower as the least likely target for the leaders. By having an insulated
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg01108.html (9,062 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] lightning standards (changes) (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:36:02 -0400
I look at it this way. Tower ungrounded, antennas on top tied directly to coax, coax goes into house, coax is the most conductive path to ground through the house or rig: To me it makes the house or
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg01117.html (11,016 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu