Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+passive\s+\"autotuner\"\?\?\?\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+passive\s+\"autotuner\"\?\?\?\?\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] passive "autotuner"????? (score: 1): Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 13:42:40 -0500; Is this what you are proposing? It would present a mostly horizontal component with the stubs serving as a small vertical component. The stubs might just hang and be flexibly tensioned to prevent ta; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00126.html (8,839 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] passive "autotuner"????? (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 21:33:04 -0700; If you start allowing multiple Ls and Cs in your matching network (whether they are lumped or transmission line stubs) there's no reason why you couldn't get a 1:1 match in all bands with almost any; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00147.html (9,481 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]