Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+plastic\s+forms\s+$\!$\s+for\s+cage\s+dipoles\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+plastic\s+forms\s+$\!$\s+for\s+cage\s+dipoles\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] plastic forms (!) for cage dipoles (score: 1): Author: "David J Windisch" <davidjw@cinci.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:55:50 -0400; randl.com has 'em: 3 or 4" dia.rings with holes and slots on the perimeter. I'm up the tower today or real soon now to hang experimental 60M and 30M half-wave wires on an existing balun-fed 80M half-; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00500.html (6,997 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] plastic forms (!) for cage dipoles (score: 1): Author: n8de@thepoint.net; Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 08:07:45 -0400; Dave, For the price, HULA HOOPS work very well! Don N8DE _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.co; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00501.html (8,045 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] plastic forms (!) for cage dipoles (score: 1): Author: "David J Windisch" <davidjw@cinci.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:19:07 -0400; Hula hoops? Did you mean something else? Iirc, they're 3'-4' in diameter. These randl.com things are 3"-4" dia. and $0.35@, btw. 73 Dave W8FGX _______________________________________________ ________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00503.html (8,001 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] plastic forms (!) for cage dipoles (score: 1): Author: n8de@thepoint.net; Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:23:41 -0400; Dave, Yes ... hula hoops ... the antenna would be very wide band with that spread. Don N8DE _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk m; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00504.html (7,870 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] plastic forms (!) for cage dipoles (score: 1): Author: "David J Windisch" <davidjw@cinci.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:26:09 -0400; Now I see ;o) Btw, randl.com calls these things " JTCAGE ", $0.35@. Usual diclaimers. 73 Dave W8FGX _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Tow; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00505.html (7,864 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] plastic forms (!) for cage dipoles (score: 1): Author: "Glen - W5IF" <W5IF@valornet.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:04:29 +0100; Maybe Don and Dave could carry this conversation on between themselves and not wear out the rest of the groups delete key. Obviously this topic has run its course. 73 W5IF --Original Message-- From:; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00506.html (9,313 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] plastic forms (!) for cage dipoles (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:28:32 -0500; Run it's course? I don't think so. Did we get a new moderator on TowerTalk? I was just looking at those spreaders and wondering if anyone had used them. How thick and rugged are they? Are they plasti; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00507.html (9,259 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] plastic forms (!) for cage dipoles (score: 1): Author: "Bill Aycock" <billaycock@centurytel.net>; Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:47:32 -0500; Howard Maybe YOU are bored with the subject of Cage Dipoles, but there are some of us that are still interested. After all, this list is dedicated to towers, AND what they support. I think that inclu; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00508.html (9,438 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] plastic forms (!) for cage dipoles (score: 1): Author: "Bill Aycock" <billaycock@centurytel.net>; Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:00:44 -0500; Bob The dimensions I finally found were 3-7/16 OD and 2-7/16 ID, with 12 holes, half of which were accessible by L-shaped slots. I think this is small. If I am going to the trouble of making one, I w; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00509.html (11,293 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] plastic forms (!) for cage dipoles (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:45:32 -0400; I don't recall any previous posts on a multiband parasitic dipoles. I am interested in hearing how this works so please post your results on the list. John KK9A Maybe Don and Dave could carry this co; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00510.html (9,862 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] plastic forms (!) for cage dipoles (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:52:59 -0400; K0RC: Someone said 3" or 4". I was expecting something larger like 6" to 12". That's what you usually see when fabricated from X braces. Yes it did: http://www.rlham.com/cgi-bin/shop/modellookup.dbw?; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00511.html (8,800 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] plastic forms (!) for cage dipoles (score: 1): Author: "WA3GIN" <wa3gin@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:35:18 -0400; I've made loops of smaller sizes from 1/2" PVC tubing used by TV cable companies to underground cable. The stuff works fine and one can join the ends using a short piece of dowel and silicon glue or; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00514.html (9,549 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]