Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+porcupines\s+and\s+chemical\s+ground\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+porcupines\s+and\s+chemical\s+ground\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] porcupines and chemical ground (score: 1): Author: "Peter Grillo" <ah3c@frii.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 10:26:11 -0700; Now that this thread has shot enough holes in spline balls made by www.ligtningeliminators.com , or so called porcupines, what can you all recommend for my situation on top of Buckhorn mountain, elev; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00632.html (14,668 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] porcupines and chemical ground (score: 1): Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 13:17:00 -0500; Ok, you mentioned steel roof and lightning strike and made me sit up straight! You do note that it was not grounded. My new house is entirely steel and well-grounded (I hope) -- anything you have le; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00635.html (9,447 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] porcupines and chemical ground (score: 1): Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 18:23:40 -0000; Chemically enhanced grounds are good for power line safety grounding, but are of questionable use at rf and hence lightning related frequencies. The problem is that the added conductivity is in a rat; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00636.html (19,620 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]