Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+radials\-bare\s+vs\s+ins\.\-wire\s+size\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+radials\-bare\s+vs\s+ins\.\-wire\s+size\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] radials-bare vs ins.-wire size (score: 1): Author: dhearn@ix.netcom.com (dan hearn); Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 09:40:19 -0700; I would like to hear comments on bare vs insulated wire for buried radials. Also on use of smaller wire sizes,i.e. 28 vs 14, and stranded vs solid. Particularly interested in any measurements or test; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-08/msg00230.html (8,116 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] radials-bare vs ins.-wire size (score: 1): Author: Dick Green" <dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green); Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 14:51:57 -0400; Dan, FWIW, I used 60 number 16 bare solid 1/4-wave radials on each element of my 40M 4-square, pinned to the surface with bobby pins and bonded in the center square at the overlap points (possibly no; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-08/msg00232.html (9,729 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]