Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+stacking\s+distances\s+\-\-\s+YT\s+and\s+TA\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+stacking\s+distances\s+\-\-\s+YT\s+and\s+TA\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] stacking distances -- YT and TA (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 08:03:39 -0500; I think Dave's statement could be misread to mean that YT adds 3 dB gain for a stack over a single antenna, regardless of spacing. It doesn't. Instead, there is a gain error that gets more obvious (l; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00192.html (10,254 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] stacking distances -- YT and TA (score: 1): Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV); Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 08:59:36 -0500; I know that TA does not compute interaction, just simply because of the way it works. TA takes the free space pattern of the antenna as input. So any possible cross-coupling between elements is only; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00194.html (12,997 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] stacking distances -- YT and TA (score: 1): Author: Tonno Vahk" <tonno.vahk@mail.ee (Tonno Vahk); Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 16:25:43 +0200; TA anyway does more accurate job. I did the same with 4el 20m yagis. 50 and 100 is 16.2 dbi (about 2.4 dbi over single upper), 50 and 60 feet is basically the same as the upper (13.5 dbi) so no gain; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00195.html (12,607 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]