- 1. [TowerTalk] step ir vs zero five (score: 1)
- Author: "K2VI" <k2vi@cox.net>
- Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 16:23:59 -0400
- I can't advise if the big ir is a better alternative however i do own the zero five with 60 ground radials from 28-60'. I will say on 40 meters past 1000 miles it plays excellent. Inside that distanc
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00233.html (7,366 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] step ir vs zero five (score: 1)
- Author: Richard Solomon <dickw1ksz@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 13:31:51 -0700
- That's because at frequencies above 14 MHZ, it makes a nice cloud warmer. The higher the frequency, the warmer the clouds get. 73, Dick, W1KSZ _______________________________________________ ________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00235.html (8,190 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] step ir vs zero five (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike" <hinrgdj@centurylink.net>
- Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 16:30:23 -0500
- You can try adding an inductor to ground w/taps from the bottom of the 43ft vertical to your radial plate and pick down from the top from the radiator and from the bottom up for a match if 43ft looks
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00240.html (8,688 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] step ir vs zero five (score: 1)
- Author: "Barrie Smith" <barrie@centric.net>
- Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 15:55:30 -0700
- This chat about Zero Five verticals got me curious, so I went to their site. I discovered a 57' vertical that "looks" good, so I called the number. The website says he's open on Saturday, but no luck
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00241.html (7,436 bytes)
- 5. [TowerTalk] step ir vs zero five (score: 1)
- Author: "Phil & Debbie Salas" <dpsalas@tx.rr.com>
- Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 16:59:03 -0500
- "That's because at frequencies above 14 MHZ, it makes a nice cloud warmer. The higher the frequency, the warmer the clouds get." Well, that depends on your definition of cloud burner. The 43-foot ver
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00269.html (7,048 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu