Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+steppir\s+v\.\s+lpda\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] steppir v. lpda (score: 1)
Author: jim Jarvis <jimjarvis@optonline.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 15:24:07 -0500
This topic is like eating potato chips. Private communication from N2TK reveals that SteppIR had a supply problem with Fernco boots, and used Mission for a while. The Mission boots have a UV degradat
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00594.html (7,858 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] steppir v. lpda (score: 1)
Author: "Gene Fuller" <w2lu@rochester.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 16:23:11 -0500
For the umpteenth time,ehy not make up 200 ohm line,using 1/4" copper tubing, on standoffs to keep aay from the boom, placing the balun back at the mast, where it is accessible. -- Original Message -
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00600.html (9,324 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] steppir v. lpda (score: 1)
Author: "Steve, W3AHL" <w3ahl@att.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:05:57 -0500
Since the Tennadynes that I've seen have a 50 ohm nominal feed point Z, not 200 ohm, the issue is a little different. Having a balun at the front of the boom isn't a problem if it's constructed corre
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00613.html (9,221 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] steppir v. lpda (score: 1)
Author: "F.R. Ashley" <gdadx2@clearwire.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:24:52 -0500
Am I going to work something on a SteppIR that I can't work on a LP? Or a TH7? Don't think so. _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTal
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00615.html (10,450 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] steppir v. lpda (score: 1)
Author: "Mike" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 17:53:21 -0800
It depends, if you have all day to sit and call you may work a DX station thru a pile up on anything, but if the guy say I am going to work three more stations then you might not, which is where the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00616.html (11,797 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] steppir v. lpda (score: 1)
Author: "Jon Zabel" <thejoz2@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 17:56:21 -0800
_______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00617.html (11,368 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] steppir v. lpda (score: 1)
Author: "F.R. Ashley" <gdadx2@clearwire.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 23:47:47 -0500
Its not on 12 or 17. I have to use wires for those bands, which is one reason this thread got started, remember? I've had a TH7 for a number of years, I still have worked anyone I've heard,. wire ant
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00634.html (12,729 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] steppir v. lpda (score: 1)
Author: "Mike" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 21:22:21 -0800
That's point really isn't it, if your happy doing what you're doing and DXing is not important, then any antenna that does job is okay. But the discussion was about the best bang for your buck and th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00636.html (13,835 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu