Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+takeoff\s+angle\s+for\s+verticals\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+takeoff\s+angle\s+for\s+verticals\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] takeoff angle for verticals (score: 1): Author: mraz@aud.alcatel.com (Kris Mraz, N5KM); Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 13:07:39 -0500; Are the takeoffs angles for radial-less verticals such as the R7 and radial-ed verticals such as the Butternut HF-9V identical given identical nearfield/farfield ground conditions? -- 73 Kris N5KM ma; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00674.html (7,079 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] takeoff angle for verticals (score: 1): Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson Courtesy Account); Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 12:57:12 -0700; To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Very similar but not quite exactly the same. Mostly the differences are due to the differing apparent height of the antenna's phase center (for relatively equal sized r; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00681.html (7,657 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]