Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+telerex\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+telerex\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] telerex (score: 1): Author: Joe Barnes <n4jbk@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 15:09:30 -0500; Not real sure where tvd got that the Telrex monobanders were not well built, Im currently using a 6 element 20 meter Telerex that wa originally installed in 1978 and it still rocks, Im thinkin there; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00062.html (7,161 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] telerex (score: 1): Author: David Jordan <wa3gin@erols.com>; Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 16:24:50 -0500; Hi Joe, One has to appreciate and remember that typically responders on this reflector and perhaps most others speak as if they've done a national survey when more often their statements are not much; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00064.html (9,582 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] telerex (score: 1): Author: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:51:43 -0500; Good comments, Dave. I thought of another thing to add. Because of the through-the-boom element mounting, it was prohibitively difficult (which means almost impossible) to put the antenna together on; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00066.html (11,792 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] telerex (score: 1): Author: "Dusty Chapman" <k3wc@bellatlantic.net>; Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 18:36:26 -0500; Let's not forget the neatest thing about Telrex antennas were the "Corona" balls on the ends of the elements. 73, Dusty _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00071.html (14,320 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]