Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+tower\s+specs\/not\s+wind\s+loads\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] tower specs/not wind loads (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Shelton" <Steve@bnjcomp.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 12:09:44 -0600
Hi, I am fairly new to towers and I have tried to research information on rohn's 25, 45 and 55 towers. I have found quite a bit of information on these towers but not the exact answers that I am look
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00449.html (7,708 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] tower specs/not wind loads (score: 1)
Author: N0OEL@aol.com
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 23:39:05 EST
Many of the towers made today are designed to sway and you dont want to guy them such as the popular line of Universal Aluminum towers. The steel towers are built to be self supporting to a certain h
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00451.html (8,337 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] tower specs/not wind loads (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Brown" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:22:49 -0000
I may be completely off base with this, and if I am, I'll apologize right now. With the Rohn BX, and HDBX series of towers, the "square foot" changes according to model. But I swear, I thought I read
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00457.html (9,945 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] tower specs/not wind loads (score: 1)
Author: Don Havlicek <n8de@thepoint.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 09:12:22 -0500
5.5 square feet? Do you mean CUBIC feet? If so, that is definitely NOT enough concrete. 5.5 Cubic YARDS makes more sense to me, as my Universal towers ALL have from 4 to 6 Cubic YARDS of concrete bel
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00459.html (9,970 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] tower specs/not wind loads (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:27:12 +0000
Mike: You're correct - the BX-series of antennas has a torque limit on them. This is because they are assembled with rivets, not welds, between the cross pieces and between the cross pieces and the l
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00461.html (11,891 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] tower specs/not wind loads (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:46:47 -0600
I will confirm what Gene is saying about the BX towers who's cross members are riveted, not welded. In my youthful radio career, I put up 104 ft of HDBX tower. It was 4-way guyed at several levels. I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00472.html (9,461 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] tower specs/not wind loads (score: 1)
Author: <ersmar@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 15:27:54 -0500
Bob: Which model Trylon tower is riveted? I own a T-500-64 (Trylon's Titan design) and I built the thing myself with SS bolts and associated HW. I didn't want readers to think that ALL Trylons were r
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00481.html (10,733 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] tower specs/not wind loads (score: 1)
Author: "A.J. Farmer (AJ3U)" <farmer.aj@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:00:04 -0500
C'mon fellas - none of you answered this guy's question but instead hijacked the thread and started on about other things not even related to his question... Steve, my understanding is that the maxim
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00482.html (10,249 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] tower specs/not wind loads (score: 1)
Author: "Pat Barthelow" <aa6eg@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 13:15:34 -0800
Folks: Been there, done that, on a Rohn 25, 50 footer free standing, of a ham friend, donating some tower work....The tower was professionally installed, with what looked like a 5' by 5' square concr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00484.html (11,716 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] tower specs/not wind loads (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 15:16:15 -0600
Gene, This might be a case of acute C.R.S. of my earlier radio career...! I worked on 2 different Trylons. These were both delivered as nestled, "assembled" sections, not as put-together kits. But no
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00485.html (13,498 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] tower specs/not wind loads (score: 1)
Author: "Richard M. Gillingham" <rmoodyg@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 17:33:55 -0500
Oops. Meant this to go to the reflector. _______________ As I recall, Rohn said you could have up to 33 feet of unguyed tower above a housebracket. I have never seen anything about unguyed without th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00486.html (13,734 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] tower specs/not wind loads (score: 1)
Author: "K8RI on Tower talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 20:06:03 -0500
I am only quoting figures. I am not making any recommdations. According to the ROHN catalog I have in front of me. Self supporting 2.3 safety factor 70 MPH, 34.1' *Recommended* So ROHN recommends no
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00494.html (10,600 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] tower specs/not wind loads (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 22:57:41 EST
on these towers as well. Umm, I don't know what Trylon you looked at but they all use nut and bolts. In fact most of the nuts have little imbedded star washers on them which makes them real easy to u
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00499.html (8,789 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] tower specs/not wind loads (score: 1)
Author: "Don Moman" <ve6jy@3web.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 04:35:04 -0000
I have owned a Trylon in which most of the upper sections used rivets. This is not the norm, though. I believe it was quite an early model - or someone choose to use rivets - as I would agree that cu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00503.html (9,426 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] tower specs/not wind loads (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:52:45 EST
I've been following this thread and most of the answers you got were either flat wrong or based on some anecdotal info that clearly exceeds the manufacturer's specs. And the examples you cited above
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00513.html (9,904 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu