Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+towers\s+on\s+roofs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+towers\s+on\s+roofs\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] towers on roofs (score: 1): Author: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 17:19:47 -0000; There were two similar questions on this topic, one had a hazer, the other did not. One man's opinion: Towers on roofs are a bad idea. It costs as much to support the weight and seal the roof as a co; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00169.html (7,712 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] towers on roofs (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com; Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 12:43:21 EST; to have lightning have a solid path to ground, around my house. << Better idea might be to build the house around the tower, that's what Arnold, W2HCW had to do due to zoning regulations "If the towe; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00170.html (7,044 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] towers on roofs (score: 1): Author: na9d@speakeasy.net; Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 21:48:19 +0000; Depends on how big the tower is. I have a 14 foot tower/tripod on my roof and it's been up there for years and has worked great. I used to have my HF beam on it, but since then I have put up 53 feet; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00179.html (9,366 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]