- 1. [TowerTalk] vertical (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry stowell" <lclarks@nc.rr.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 19:43:34 -0500
- Has anybody installed a CC mv8040 with elevated radials? Larry K1ZW _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@co
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00018.html (7,225 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] Vertical (score: 1)
- Author: "Ronald Anderson" <w9rma@charter.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:06:52 -0500
- Anyone know who made this vertical, base & traps are light blue in color. Ron _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list To
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00334.html (6,778 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Nielsen <n7xy@clearwire.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:25:56 -0700
- I had a Hy-Gain vertical in the late 1950s with a light blue base insulator and traps. Bob, N7XY _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerT
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00336.html (6,947 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical (score: 1)
- Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:22:44 -0400
- Unfortunately the photo didn't come through, but as has been mentioned, Hy-Gain did use some light blue insulators back in the 70's (give or take). Generally the base of the insulator was round and a
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00337.html (7,241 bytes)
- 5. [TowerTalk] Vertical (score: 1)
- Author: John Groom <jamdog509@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 11:44:43 -0400
- Slightly off target subject but does anyone have experience with the Cushcraft R9 or the Hygain AV680 verticals. Looking for a wireless 40-80 option for winter while my tower is renovated. Thanks in
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2019-08/msg00183.html (6,422 bytes)
- 6. [TowerTalk] Vertical (score: 1)
- Author: Gary Johnson <gwj@wb9jps.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 10:18:47 -0700
- I helped a friend with a new R9. The big problem is very narrow usable bandwidth especially on 80, where as I recall its about 25 kHz 3:1. Almost as narrow on 40. Hes a new ham who mostly does FT8 o
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2019-08/msg00184.html (7,358 bytes)
- 7. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical (score: 1)
- Author: Gedas <w8bya@mchsi.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 17:37:34 -0400
- Lots of variables involved but for what it is worth, before my R8 came down from excessive winds I enjoyed getting comparative signal reports between it (mounted in the clear with base at 15') and a
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2019-08/msg00187.html (9,149 bytes)
- 8. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical (score: 1)
- Author: Phil <pmills7@comcast.net>
- Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 16:52:25 -0500
- My personal experience with the R9 was not good. I'd been a Cushcraft fan for years and when my R8 got trashed I decided to put the R9 to have the 80 meter coverage. First, the antenna is tall and yo
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2019-08/msg00188.html (8,262 bytes)
- 9. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical (score: 1)
- Author: Dick Williams <richardk8ztt@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 19:02:15 -0600
- As for a 40M and 80M antenna; it depends on what range you are wanting to maximize your signal (NVIS or DXing with a low angle of radiation). For NVIS, a low dipole is by far the best choice. For DXi
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2019-08/msg00189.html (10,957 bytes)
- 10. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 21:18:27 -0700
- This is an absolute fallacy, although widely believed. See slide 19 in http://k9yc.com/VertOrHorizontal-Slides.pdf which shows that upward radiation peaks on 80M at a height of 55 ft, and drops by on
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2019-08/msg00191.html (12,800 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu