Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+vertical\s+dipole\s+for\s+3\.8\s+MHZ\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+vertical\s+dipole\s+for\s+3\.8\s+MHZ\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] vertical dipole for 3.8 MHZ (score: 1): Author: vfair@innova.net (Van Fair); Date: Thu Mar 6 12:57:21 2003; Anyone have any experience with a vertical dipole for 75 meters. I can hang a vertical wire off my tower from 66 feet and feed it at any point. The problem is that this is too short on 3.8 MHZ. I can; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-03/msg00085.html (7,221 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] vertical dipole for 3.8 MHZ (score: 1): Author: gtucker@bostoneng.com (G.E. Tucker); Date: Thu Mar 6 15:09:17 2003; You might try simply a horizontal dipole, using the 66 foot tower as center support, and preferably getting the ends also up as high as possible (as little V as possible). I'm using a 80M dipole that; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-03/msg00088.html (8,561 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] vertical dipole for 3.8 MHZ (score: 1): Author: spelunk.sueno@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR); Date: Thu Mar 6 20:25:55 2003; Van: A local (Washngton, DC) ham uses the C-shape for his vertical wire antenna on 160M and claims he does pretty well with it. He cut the dipole for 160M as usual. The center section he hung vertica; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-03/msg00104.html (9,623 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] vertical dipole for 3.8 MHZ (score: 1): Author: SavageBR@aol.com (SavageBR@aol.com); Date: Thu Mar 6 21:08:19 2003; I think the C antenna was originally presented by K2KQ in the YCCC newsletter Scuttlebutt. Bruce AA4Z; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-03/msg00105.html (6,739 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]