Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+wind\s+load\s+revisited\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+wind\s+load\s+revisited\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] wind load revisited (score: 1): Author: brunet@us.ibm.com (brunet@us.ibm.com); Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 17:03:47 -0500; I looked through my notes from a discussion on this reflector a while back and want to rediscuss it just to be sure our plans are OK. Let's assume 70' of 45G at 70mph. The flat spec is 9.5 sq ft. Sin; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00191.html (7,793 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] wind load revisited (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 18:21:33 EDT; of allowable of 2 feet. Not really. Your juggling is successful and since you're below the tower rating, you're in fat city. By using the 'flats' spec, you've actually decreased the tower rating sinc; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00193.html (8,345 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]