Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+wire\s+yagis\s+for\s+the\s+top\s+band\s+vs\s+phased\s+26\.5\s+m\s+verticals\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] wire yagis for the top band vs phased 26.5 m verticals (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wagner <kf6vci@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 10:31:49 +0700
Greetings! My YL consented to a humble antenna farm. Instead of spending big bucks on costly towers, I plan a low cost solution with wire yagis pointing NW from Thailand, where 90% of all QSO partner
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-12/msg00186.html (8,307 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] wire yagis for the top band vs phased 26.5 m verticals (score: 1)
Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 22:56:48 -0500
Have you considered a bruce array? You seem to be wanting low cost and a fixed direction, so a two or three element bruce array may do the trick for you. A two element bruce array contains a full wav
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-12/msg00188.html (8,875 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] wire yagis for the top band vs phased 26.5 m verticals (score: 1)
Author: Dennis OConnor <ad4hk2004@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 07:46:10 -0800 (PST)
Buy the EZNEC 5 program from W7EL and save yourself far more money in wasted materials and futile effort than what the program costs... You can model your suggested antennas and look at the main lobe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-12/msg00204.html (7,908 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] wire yagis for the top band vs phased 26.5 m verticals (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 07:52:49 -0800
or 4NEC2, which is free.. EZNEC and 4NEC2 each have their adherents, they both fundamentally use the NEC engine underneath it all so will produce the same results. Some folks find the model entry eas
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-12/msg00206.html (7,974 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu