Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+160\s+Meter\s+Sloper\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+160\s+Meter\s+Sloper\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] 160 Meter Sloper (score: 1): Author: w5vx@hiline.net (Bill Parry); Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 08:52:52 -0500; I'm planning to put up a 1/4 wave sloper for 160. I understand that the usual approach is to ground the shield of the coax at the top of the tower and connect a 1/4 wave of wire to the hot side of th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00525.html (7,216 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] 160 Meter Sloper (score: 1): Author: i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara); Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 16:13:52 +0200; Bill, it' won't work properly. The slooper is a sort of a slant, upside down GP antenna. To make it working then you need all the metal (large antennas) that's on the tower top, grounding the wire th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00526.html (8,492 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] 160 Meter Sloper (score: 1): Author: SPELUNK.SUENO@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR); Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 15:47:41 -0400; Bill: Check out a posting from Tom N4KG dated Jan 7 of this year in the TT archives. It contains a lot of good performance and installation info on slopers. GL es 73 de Gene Smar AD3F --Original Mess; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00535.html (8,413 bytes)
4. [Towertalk] 160 Meter Sloper (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 22:20:17 -0400; That probably won't work correctly Bill. Think of it this way...the wire coming down to the ground is part of the antenna. If it is 1/8 wl long, the impedance will be very reactive and different tha; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00540.html (7,673 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]