Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+2eleL\s+40\s+and\s+TH7\s+Stacking\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+2eleL\s+40\s+and\s+TH7\s+Stacking\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] 2eleL 40 and TH7 Stacking (score: 1): Author: Jim W7RY" <w7ry@centurytel.net (Jim W7RY); Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 20:43:46 -0800; I know this has been discussed SEVERAL times before... BUT Has anyone had any REAL success stacking a 2 element Cushcraft 40 and a TH7DX on the same mast ? I do not want to have 1 rotated 90 degrees.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00289.html (7,488 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] 2eleL 40 and TH7 Stacking (score: 1): Author: Jim W7RY" <w7ry@centurytel.net (Jim W7RY); Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 21:32:23 -0800; Thanks Jim! The TH7 and the 2 element 40 are both older antennas. I should be able to get at least 10' between em. I was thinking that it would be better to put the th7 on top. That way the element d; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00291.html (10,569 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] 2eleL 40 and TH7 Stacking (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 01:54:00 -0600; I would put the 2L40 on TOP for both electrical and mechanical reasons. I find that 10, 15, and often 20M antennas SUCK during midday hours when placed at 70 to 100 ft compared with lower antennas fo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00293.html (9,638 bytes)
4. [Towertalk] 2eleL 40 and TH7 Stacking (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 01:58:49 -0600; Element droop on the 402CD can be reduced considerably by DOUBLE Walling the first piece of tubing in each element. This will also raise the wind survival from >70 MPH to <90 MPH. I also recommend pu; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00294.html (12,536 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]