Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+40M\s+Dipole\s+Height\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+40M\s+Dipole\s+Height\.\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] 40M Dipole Height. (score: 1): Author: Robert Webb" <g0urr@btopenworld.com (Robert Webb); Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 19:02:55 +0100; Hello everyone, a quickie for you. I have a 60ft tower with a 1/4 wave 40m coax fed dipole attached at the 55ft point. Due to land restrictions, the two ends slope down sharply and the two ends are a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00329.html (7,452 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] 40M Dipole Height. (score: 1): Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider (N3RR)); Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 14:48:05 -0400; Robert, Do you really mean 1/4 wave dipole (each leg being approx 5 meters long)? Or do you mean 1/2 wave dipole (each leg being approx 10 meters long)? Are you specifying the length of each leg, or; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00331.html (8,799 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] 40M Dipole Height. (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 06:27:05 -0600; Do you have an HF Yagi on top of your tower? Your BEST bet for 40M would be a rotary dipole of some sort, such as a CC D40 on the mast above a High Band Yagi, or, Match the BOOM of a high band Yagi a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00336.html (8,612 bytes)
4. [Towertalk] 40M Dipole Height. (score: 1): Author: richard@karlquist.com (Richard Karlquist); Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 20:20:22 -0700; I recently A/B'ed two 40m antennas that were very similar to your existing and proposed antennas. One was an inverted vee at 60 feet (apex height) with a 90 degree apex angle, and the other was an in; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00352.html (9,204 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]