Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Any\s+glaring\s+discrepancies\?\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Any glaring discrepancies? (score: 1)
Author: blueis@sprintmail.com (blueis@sprintmail.com)
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 13:22:05 -0400
After the fourth iteration I have made the 'final' decisions. The Spring (?) antenna/tower project will consist of 70' AN Wireless tower (*massive* windloading spec!), TH7 at 5' above top of tower, C
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00405.html (10,074 bytes)

2. [Towertalk] Any glaring discrepancies? (score: 1)
Author: weightdn@adelphia.net (Mike Rhodes)
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 13:40:06 -0400
Gary, Can't comment on the antennas but my instinct tells me to put the remote coax switch down within easy reach - not necessarily at the base of the tower but not any higher than you can easily acc
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00407.html (8,457 bytes)

3. [Towertalk] Any glaring discrepancies? (score: 1)
Author: FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com (FireBrick)
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 12:52:23 -0500
great comment Mike. Those switches get cranky during the winter and when P5 says I'm standing by for W9D stations only...it's easier to put a barrel connector across the coaxes instead of troubleshoo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00408.html (9,681 bytes)

4. [Towertalk] Any glaring discrepancies? (score: 1)
Author: Chuck@dxham.net (Chuck Sudds)
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 13:09:01 -0500
I must concur totally with these remarks! I have 100ft of Rohn 45G with the remote switch located at the 20 ft level, as I run elevated wires 250 ft to this tower, with tag-lines. Any coax losses at
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00409.html (9,130 bytes)

5. [Towertalk] Any glaring discrepancies? (score: 1)
Author: w5kp@swbell.net (Jerry Kincade)
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 13:25:54 -0700
Sounds like a great setup, but I believe not enough rotator. If you do use a Ham IV, buy several and be sure they are easy to change out, because IMHO you will be doing it often. 73, Jerry W5KP
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00411.html (8,798 bytes)

6. [Towertalk] Any glaring discrepancies? (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@despammed.com (k6ll@despammed.com)
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 14:38:46 -0500 (EST)
A few thoughts: I don't like Ham-IV's. The top and bottom halves are held together by self-tapping screws that are a weak link. It's very embarrassing to come home and find the bottom half of the ro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00417.html (9,955 bytes)

7. [Towertalk] Any glaring discrepancies? (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@despammed.com (k6ll@despammed.com)
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 14:39:06 -0500 (EST)
A few thoughts: I don't like Ham-IV's. The top and bottom halves are held together by self-tapping screws that are a weak link. It's very embarrassing to come home and find the bottom half of the ro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00418.html (9,745 bytes)

8. [Towertalk] Any glaring discrepancies? (score: 1)
Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 15:58:37 -0400
Is there any documented work relating to the optimal mast position within a tower? For example, if one contemplates using a 20-foot steel mast with a Force12 C31 on one end, inserted into Rohn 55, w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00420.html (8,677 bytes)

9. [Towertalk] Any glaring discrepancies? (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 15:57:57 -0400
I think this spacing may turn out to be too close, particularly between the A3WS and the TH-7. I think this is asking a bit too much of the Ham IV. A Tailtwister would be a stronger choice. Wouldn't
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00421.html (11,005 bytes)

10. [Towertalk] Any glaring discrepancies? (score: 1)
Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (WYsixK)
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 13:25:28 -0700 (PDT)
I also would suggest a different rotator. I have an HDR300 that has been seriously overloaded for 20 years and it has been nearly flawless. __________________________________________________ Do You Y
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00423.html (11,308 bytes)

11. [Towertalk] Any glaring discrepancies? (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 17:40:42 EDT
Not necessarily. The big question is what the county windspeed rating is. It's at <A HREF="http://www.championradio.com">www.championradio.com</A> under Tech Notes if you don't know. Let us know what
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00429.html (8,860 bytes)

12. [Towertalk] Any glaring discrepancies? (score: 1)
Author: Jim White" <k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White)
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 15:22:51 -0400
Why not bring all your coaxes to the ground....and install the coax switch there... Why? In case of failure of the switch it is a piece of cake to diagnose and fix it.... Initially this is a bigger c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00430.html (12,322 bytes)

13. [Towertalk] Any glaring discrepancies? (score: 1)
Author: ag0n@arrl.net (ag0n@arrl.net)
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 17:55:30 -0600
Actually, maybe Steve would like an all expenses paid "vacation" in PA! ;o) Gary a g 0 n at a r r l dot n e t http colon slash slash mcduffie dot ws --
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00436.html (8,504 bytes)

14. [Towertalk] Any glaring discrepancies? (score: 1)
Author: ag0n@arrl.net (ag0n@arrl.net)
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 17:56:30 -0600
I'll leave spacing and all that to others. But, the thing that seemed to stick out as I read it was the rotor. The Ham IV is pretty light. In fact, I might even question use of a T2X, especially sinc
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00437.html (8,951 bytes)

15. [Towertalk] Any glaring discrepancies? (score: 1)
Author: kk9a@arrl.net (kk9a@arrl.net)
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 19:44:35 -0500
I would not recommend the HDR300. I owned two of them for several years and they needed servicing many times. The biggest problem was that the shaft keyway would elongate and become very sloppy. The
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00442.html (11,481 bytes)

16. [Towertalk] Any glaring discrepancies? (score: 1)
Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (WYsixK)
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 18:08:55 -0700 (PDT)
Interesting, I've got a 3 3l 40 meter KLM, 7 element F12 15 meter monobander, and Hygain 5 el 20 meter monobander on a 20' chrome moly mast with steps on it. And I've never had a problem. Could the d
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00444.html (12,976 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu