Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+BEST\s+TOWER\s+HEIGHT\s+OPTION\:\s+Single\s+stack\s+or\s+2\s+towers\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+BEST\s+TOWER\s+HEIGHT\s+OPTION\:\s+Single\s+stack\s+or\s+2\s+towers\?\?\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] BEST TOWER HEIGHT OPTION: Single stack or 2 towers?? (score: 1): Author: RLVZ@aol.com (RLVZ@aol.com); Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 13:11:12 EDT; Hi Guys & thanks Steve for Towertalk We'd appreciate your thoughts. Our new club station site is limited to a tower height of 70'. We have two tower options we are considering. Please advise which of; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00013.html (8,353 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] BEST TOWER HEIGHT OPTION: Single stack or 2 towers?? (score: 1): Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White); Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2002 13:44:50 -0400; I like the flexibility of two towers - do not know if you are looking for a contest type station or what... Having multiple towers also means your eggs are not in one basket so to speak....and.... yo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00016.html (9,765 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] BEST TOWER HEIGHT OPTION: Single stack or 2 towers?? (score: 1): Author: spelunk.sueno@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR); Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 17:44:39 -0400; Richard: Wish I had the option of choosing one OR two towers! Hi, Hi. For the life of me I can't understand why you'd want to spend the extra $$ on a second full tower, guying(?), conduit runs, groun; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00031.html (10,914 bytes)
4. [Towertalk] BEST TOWER HEIGHT OPTION: Single stack or 2 towers?? (score: 1): Author: MPeiperl@london.edu (Maury Peiperl); Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2002 03:38:07 +0100; Absolutely put up the two towers if you have room. And as Jim says, you can add that stacked tribander later on (or now, if you can afford it). This allows you to run the stack on one band while gett; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00040.html (11,303 bytes)
5. [Towertalk] BEST TOWER HEIGHT OPTION: Single stack or 2 towers?? (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 00:44:51 -0600; I favor the 2 Tower approach. Then you could always add a third tribander at 40 ft on the 70 footer. I would also suggest a STRONG 20 ft mast (8 - 10 ft inside the top section) and a 2L40 on top, or; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00046.html (10,128 bytes)
6. [Towertalk] BEST TOWER HEIGHT OPTION: Single stack or 2 towers?? (score: 1): Author: jperalta@tampabay.rr.com (Julio Peralta); Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 16:43:21 -0400; Why do you say to put up to 10' of mast inside the tower. It seems to me to be a waste of mast. Julio -- Original Message -- From: <n4kg@juno.com> To: <TOWERTALK@contesting.com>; <RLVZ@aol.com> Sent:; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00073.html (11,537 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]