Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Coax\s+Connecter\s+Losses\s+\-\s+Dose\s+anyone\s+know\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Coax\s+Connecter\s+Losses\s+\-\s+Dose\s+anyone\s+know\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Coax Connecter Losses - Dose anyone know? (score: 1): Author: RCARIELLO@si.rr.com (RCARIELLO); Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 14:08:59 -0000; As a side subject to the topic: "Really dumb question on coax" and then a second subject topic of: "There are no dumb questions on Tower Talk, only dumb answers!" I will submit the third subject as a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00806.html (7,709 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] Coax Connecter Losses - Dose anyone know? (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 10:43:16 -0400; Rich, I measure things like this from time to time. I understand it is difficult, in the face of so many silly rumors and false claims, to accept the fact that virtually all connectors have negligib; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00812.html (8,158 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] Coax Connecter Losses - Dose anyone know? (score: 1): Author: htodd@twofifty.com (Hisashi T Fujinaka); Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 08:33:04 -0700 (PDT); Well, I'm no Smith chart expert, and I graduated from MIT but it didn't take. :) Anyway, if you look at a connector and assume it's close to correct impedance (this is the only part I'd like someone; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00816.html (9,464 bytes)
4. [Towertalk] Coax Connecter Losses - Dose anyone know? (score: 1): Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L Martin); Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 15:33:45 -0500; Coax Fittings Redux by Bill Schrader, K2TNO (Reprinted from the TDXS Bullsheet, April 1988) I've always fallen for the old adage that says that UHF coax fittings add losses and should be kept to a m; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00827.html (10,361 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]