Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Coax\s+opinions\s*$/: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

21. [Towertalk] Coax opinions (score: 1)
Author: lclarks@nc.rr.com (Larry)
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 23:02:20 -0400
I was quite surprised that LMR400 is not suitable for direct burial!!!! Larry WA2SRY -- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts -- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00224.html (8,248 bytes)

22. [Towertalk] Coax opinions (score: 1)
Author: k4bet@bellsouth.net (Paul McInnish - Home)
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 23:12:44 -0400
They make a direct burial version... Part number: LMR-400-DB Paul - K4BET I was quite surprised that LMR400 is not suitable for direct burial!!!! Larry WA2SRY -- StripMime Report -- processed MIME pa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00225.html (9,038 bytes)

23. [Towertalk] Coax opinions (score: 1)
Author: ka5nez@clarc.org (Ken "AB5A" Eckel Jr.)
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 22:14:01 -0500
Direct burial is not cost effective in sweat equity. Bury cheap conduit once and try dozens of different coax until you get one you like. Just solder the new to the old and pull it through easy as pi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00226.html (8,881 bytes)

24. [Towertalk] Coax opinions (score: 1)
Author: n8de@thepoint.net (Don Havlicek)
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2002 22:43:22 -0500
I differ, Ken. I've built a device that buries coax/cables/radials/control lines quite easily .. no digging necessary .. just a sled I pull behind my lawn tractor. As for putting cable in a tube/pipe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00240.html (9,889 bytes)

25. [Towertalk] Coax opinions (score: 1)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 07:28:09 -0700
Belden certainly didn't invent coaxial cable, Amphenol did. Of all coaxial cables popular within the amateur realm, I'm not very fond of Belden products. The direct bury RG213/U sold by Cable XPerts
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00243.html (10,931 bytes)

26. [Towertalk] Coax opinions (score: 1)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 07:34:14 -0700
[Steve Katz] When I need them, which is rarely, I try to find them at: APEX Electronics (mil surplus warehouse and wholesaler), 8909 San Fernando Road, Sun Valley, CA (818) 767-7202. Since that's on
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00244.html (8,907 bytes)

27. [Towertalk] Coax opinions (score: 1)
Author: k4zzr@bellsouth.net (David)
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2002 13:05:39 -0400
Hi Steve.....still looking for the best coax (within reason) for my new antenna (about 125' from the shack). I'm wondering what you and others think of Cable Xperts RG8/U "low loss" CXP1318FX cable w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00248.html (12,882 bytes)

28. [Towertalk] Coax opinions (score: 1)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 10:18:20 -0700
Sure, David, I had already recommended exactly that cable (1318FX from Cable XPerts) yesterday. I use six runs of it, 165-175' per run, right now at home. Zero problems. Just be careful, it's delicat
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00249.html (14,147 bytes)

29. [Towertalk] Coax opinions (score: 1)
Author: Mark <AA6DX@arrl.net> (Mark)
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2002 11:15:36 -0700
I use RG-214 on all my runs, and am perfectly happy ... it's just not real flexible .. but, it's tough! 73 -- Mark 6dx -- Original Message -- From: "Steve Katz" <stevek@jmr.com> To: "'David'" <k4zzr@
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00252.html (15,792 bytes)

30. [Towertalk] Coax opinions (score: 1)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 11:09:34 -0700
Yep, I like RG214/U for the same reason. The double shielding doesn't do much for me (electrically), nor does the conductor silver plating; however, the solid dielectric and the two braids do tend to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00254.html (17,325 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu