Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Dipole\s+height\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Dipole\s+height\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Dipole height (score: 1): Author: w5kp@swbell.net (Jerry Kincade); Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 11:57:25 -0500; Antenna mavens: In addition to a large 10-el F12 tribander, I'm running a 121' dipole/balun with it's apex at 65' on a 6' insulated standoff, with both ends at about 50'. Sort of a gently inverted V.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00823.html (7,025 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] Dipole height (score: 1): Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV); Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 23:47:56 -0400; Moving the center of a 75/80 dipole from 65 feet to 75 feet is highly unlikely to change anything discernibly except the feed impedance of the dipole, and that not much. Are you thinking that 75 feet; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00846.html (8,523 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] Dipole height (score: 1): Author: w5kp@swbell.net (Jerry Kincade); Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 06:49:45 -0500; Oops. I was thinking of 40M, but said 80. Nothing new, I've been groping in the dark since 1941. I do have EZNEC 3.0, but haven't yet sorted out what the effects of the tower proximity and the 33' bo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00851.html (9,714 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]