Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Force\s+12\s+vs\.\s+Cushcraft\s+who\s+wins\?\s*$/: 31 ]

Total 31 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Force 12 vs. Cushcraft who wins? (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 18:35:19 EST
an gain ( DO NOT BELIEVE MANUFACTURER PUBLISHED GAIN FIGURES. (The exception are those of Force 12 net gain figures - they're pretty realistic and corroborate our findings.) You need a copy of the N0
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00023.html (9,178 bytes)

2. [Towertalk] Force 12 vs. Cushcraft who wins? (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Plemmons" <jerry@plemmons.net (Jerry Plemmons)
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 18:47:39 -0500
Michael: I recently erected a US Tower MA-770 with a 10 foot mast in the top. I installed a Force 12 XR-5 antenna on the tower. It works GREAT! I don't have a definitive way to measure the F/B or fro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00025.html (11,511 bytes)

3. [Towertalk] Force 12 vs. Cushcraft who wins? (score: 1)
Author: k2hk@arrl.net (Howard Klein)
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 00:16:20 +0000
I do agree with the other respondants concerning the comparison between A3S/A4S and 2 element Force 12 but do consider the Cushcraft X-7. It is a fine antenna. K2HK..Howard [Towertalk] Force 12 vs. C
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00026.html (9,640 bytes)

4. [Towertalk] Force 12 vs. Cushcraft who wins? (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 19:18:54 -0600
A FULL SIZE 3L20 on a 24 ft boom MAY achieve 8-8.5 dBi gain. That is 6-6.5 dB over a dipole. And you believe the little A3 on a 14 ft boom might have the same gain in 20M? NO WAY. A FULL SIZE 3L20 on
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00027.html (11,035 bytes)

5. [Towertalk] Force 12 vs. Cushcraft who wins? (score: 1)
Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com (Cqtestk4xs@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 20:13:15 EST
<< A FULL SIZE 3L20 on a 24 ft boom MAY achieve 8-8.5 dBi gain. That is 6-6.5 dB over a dipole. And you believe the little A3 on a 14 ft boom might have the same gain in 20M? NO WAY. A FULL SIZE 3L20
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00029.html (8,730 bytes)

6. [Towertalk] Force 12 vs. Cushcraft who wins? (score: 1)
Author: spelunk.sueno@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR)
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 20:39:14 -0500
Mike: Also consider the Bencher Skyhawk - 3 elements on 20 and 15 and 4 on 10. Boom is 24 feet long. 73 de Gene Smar AD3F --Original Message-- From: Howard Klein <howk2@hotmail.com> To: mike@hatzakis
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00031.html (11,547 bytes)

7. [Towertalk] Force 12 vs. Cushcraft who wins? (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com (KI9A@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 20:51:00 EST
Nice....a list that acts as a sales pitch instead of real info..... -- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts -- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00032.html (8,880 bytes)

8. [Towertalk] Force 12 vs. Cushcraft who wins? (score: 1)
Author: spelunk.sueno@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR)
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 21:29:44 -0500
TT: The book is worth the money. I bought the first and second editions. 73 de Gene Smar AD3F HREF="http://www.championradio.com/">www.championradio.com
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00034.html (10,665 bytes)

9. [Towertalk] Force 12 vs. Cushcraft who wins? (score: 1)
Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 22:00:15 -0500
Bite your tongue. That book is a bunch more "real info" than some manufacturers want you to see. One manufacturer, seeing the cruel facts about how poorly theirs stacked up, published a pitiful obfus
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00035.html (9,742 bytes)

10. [Towertalk] Force 12 vs. Cushcraft who wins? (score: 1)
Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L Martin)
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 21:23:42 -0600
Michael I had two A3's up on the tower for a few years. I replaced the top A3 with a Force 12 C3E. Haven't regretted it. I've got a C4 in the garage waiting to replace the C3e on top and the C3e will
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00036.html (10,446 bytes)

11. [Towertalk] Force 12 vs. Cushcraft who wins? (score: 1)
Author: ve6yc@shaw.ca (Peter Larsen)
Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2002 20:51:28 -0700
Have you read the report? It is quite inexpensive. I have read it and passed it on to other guys. Well worth the cost if you want to see how they did their tests and get the results. I don't think t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00037.html (9,209 bytes)

12. [Towertalk] Force 12 vs. Cushcraft who wins? (score: 1)
Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 23:02:50 -0500
I ran a Force-12 C3E at 50' with a Hygain TH-7 at 70' and most of the time the C3E was equal to or better than the TH-7. I've used the Cushcaft beams at Field Day many times and they're OK, but I lik
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00038.html (11,371 bytes)

13. [Towertalk] Force 12 vs. Cushcraft who wins? (score: 1)
Author: htodd@twofifty.com (Hisashi T Fujinaka)
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 21:46:27 -0800 (PST)
I can kind of the point of the first guy (whoever that is). The report is inexpensive, but hearing about it over and over could get old. Actually, it isn't that bad. You could be on the logger list w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00041.html (10,301 bytes)

14. [Towertalk] Force 12 vs. Cushcraft who wins? (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 02:44:35 -0500
I think this is kind of a bum rap, considering that Steve spends a lot of his time (and some of his money) keeping this list up and running. It's a tremendous resource, and I don't think he's overdon
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00042.html (10,742 bytes)

15. [Towertalk] Force 12 vs. Cushcraft who wins? (score: 1)
Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com (Cqtestk4xs@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 08:50:00 EST
I don't know K7LXC other than I met him in Dayton and bought one of his climbing harnesses...and of course, from his postings on this reflector. I don't see what the big deal is if he wants to promot
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00046.html (9,515 bytes)

16. [Towertalk] Force 12 vs. Cushcraft who wins? (score: 1)
Author: k3bz@arrl.net (Jerry Keller)
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 09:11:49 -0500
Absolutely. Add me to the list of those who think Steve has many times over earned the right to put anything on here he wants, especially when it's as directly on topic as his antenna shoot-off. Jerr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00047.html (10,595 bytes)

17. [Towertalk] Force 12 vs. Cushcraft who wins? (score: 1)
Author: kk9a@arrl.net (kk9a@arrl.net)
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 14:43:21 -0000
Towertalk is the only list that I currently subscribe to and I have learned a lot from various discussions. I would like to thank K7LXC for making this available. I also do not see any problem with h
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00051.html (10,778 bytes)

18. [Towertalk] Force 12 vs. Cushcraft who wins? (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 09:52:32 -0600
Pete, Please explain WHY you would think a 24 ft boom TH7 would have a higher F/B than a 14 ft A3? It is a well known fact that 2L parasitic Yagi's have relatively LOW F/B (<15 dB, often <10 dB). If
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00053.html (11,996 bytes)

19. [Towertalk] Force 12 vs. Cushcraft who wins? (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 10:00:03 -0600
Does this mean YOU would be willing to take the data and publish a FREE Antenna Comparison Report for the benefit of your fellow amateurs? When can we expect the results? Tom N4KG p.s. To what "real
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00054.html (9,857 bytes)

20. [Towertalk] Force 12 vs. Cushcraft who wins? (score: 1)
Author: K4BEV@aol.com (K4BEV@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 10:37:35 EST
Add me to the list too. VY TNX for this reflector Steve! It's one of the best on the internet. If YOU want to sell your car on this reflector it's OK with me. Thanks again! Don - K4BEV -- StripMime R
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00056.html (9,547 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu