- 1. [Towertalk] Inverted L - Thanks for the Help. (score: 1)
- Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
- Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 14:44:09 -0400
- Modeling shows a minor bulge away from the horizontal portion, both used as a 1/4 wave and used as a 1/2 wave. But not enough to justify how one orients it. Helpful circumstances for stringing it up
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00018.html (9,082 bytes)
- 2. [Towertalk] Inverted L - Thanks for the Help. (score: 1)
- Author: jim@kc4hw.net (Jim Johnson)
- Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 09:58:18 -0400
- Wanted to thank each of you for information and help on my post about the inverted L antenna. Got some good information from each of you. That is the nice thing about the Tower Talk reflector is that
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00787.html (7,899 bytes)
- 3. [Towertalk] Inverted L - Thanks for the Help. (score: 1)
- Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
- Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 06:02:00 -0600
- Regarding placement of the 'tail' on an inverted L, I've have the 'feeling' that there is some cancellation in the direction of the tail. Consider a takeoff angle of 45 degrees, through the tail. Dra
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00803.html (7,530 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu