Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Is\s+an\s+80m\s+Rotatable\s+Dipole\s+Worth\s+it\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Is\s+an\s+80m\s+Rotatable\s+Dipole\s+Worth\s+it\?\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Is an 80m Rotatable Dipole Worth it?? (score: 1): Author: Aidehua@aol.com (Aidehua@aol.com); Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 13:28:08 EDT; I am contemplating the installation of an 80m rotatable dipole at 86', over my other antennas. It's a shortened version (54') and has narrow bandwidth. How much better (or worse) will this perform co; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00475.html (7,098 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] Is an 80m Rotatable Dipole Worth it?? (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 18:32:04 -0600; A 70 ft high Inverted Vee suffers from near field ground losses due to the ends being closer to the ground so a FLAT dipole 'should be' a more efficient radiator. A vertically polarized Delta Loop mi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00489.html (8,778 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] Is an 80m Rotatable Dipole Worth it?? (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 18:32:04 -0600; A 70 ft high Inverted Vee suffers from near field ground losses due to the ends being closer to the ground so a FLAT dipole 'should be' a more efficient radiator. A vertically polarized Delta Loop mi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00490.html (8,763 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]