Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+It\'s\s+not\s+a\s+spitfire\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+It\'s\s+not\s+a\s+spitfire\.\.\.\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] It's not a spitfire... (score: 1): Author: jljarvis@abs.adelphia.net (jljarvis); Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 20:25:02 -0500; Seems I mis-applied the name which YCCC is using to describe a bent, sloping dipole array. A Spitfire, it's not. The system I contemplate consists of four sloping dipoles. The hoist for these is 1/2; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00421.html (7,097 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] It's not a spitfire... (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 21:13:50 -0500; Jim, I don't know if you saw my subsequent message, but I have one of these for 80m. It's terrific for that band, but it cannot be compared with a horizontal antenna -- even a dipole -- at 6.25-.750; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00424.html (7,846 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]