- 1. [Towertalk] LMR400 vs. RG-213 (score: 1)
- Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 20:48:19 -0500
- Another list member that I was having an offline conversation with suggested that it might be informative to list members to see a comparison of LMR400 with RG-213. LMR400 exceeds RG213 in a big way
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00698.html (9,066 bytes)
- 2. [Towertalk] LMR400 vs. RG-213 (score: 1)
- Author: nielsen@oz.net (Bob Nielsen)
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 19:32:03 -0700
- RG-213 has a non-contaminating jacket, not a direct burial jacket. As I recall it is practically identical to one of the RG-8 versions and I would expect that the loss figures are identical. In this
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00700.html (8,551 bytes)
- 3. [Towertalk] LMR400 vs. RG-213 (score: 1)
- Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 23:17:33 -0500
- There seems to be a lot of disagreement on this "direct burial" thing. My RG-213 says it clearly on the jacket: "Direct Burial" No, there's no goop in there, but according to what I have been told by
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00701.html (8,327 bytes)
- 4. [Towertalk] LMR400 vs. RG-213 (score: 1)
- Author: kb5my@starband.net (Dan Hammill)
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 21:56:02 -0700
- True RG-8 is also a MIL-SPEC cable (that's where the "RG-n" numbers come from). MIL-SPEC RG-8 has a solid polyethylene dielectric, which is identical to the solid polyethylene dielectric of MIL-SPEC
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00702.html (9,550 bytes)
- 5. [Towertalk] LMR400 vs. RG-213 (score: 1)
- Author: nielsen@oz.net (Bob Nielsen)
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 22:06:41 -0700
- It IS confusing. MIL-SPEC RG-8/U had a polyethylene dielectric, the same as MIL-SPEC RG-213. I recall that the original had a contaminating PVC jacket, but I think there was a later version which had
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00703.html (9,389 bytes)
- 6. [Towertalk] LMR400 vs. RG-213 (score: 1)
- Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
- Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 06:29:47 -0500
- OK. I couldn't find the specs on that. Oh that's not the half of it! I am an RF component sales rep. I sell RF connectors from a French connector company. The Europeans use yet another standard for c
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00708.html (8,313 bytes)
- 7. [Towertalk] LMR400 vs. RG-213 (score: 1)
- Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
- Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 07:39:34 -0700
- It should be noted that "loss" figures are all published by the manufacturers, or in amateur publications, but are not controlled nor maintained, nor even listed, in the governing military specificat
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00714.html (11,157 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu