Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Newbie\s+Question\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Newbie Question (score: 1)
Author: thoele@txcyber.com (Troy Thoele)
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 08:40:12 -0500
Greetings - I have been on the list for a while, and finally took my test (no code tech, I'm still working on code). It appears I passed! I have a 100ft freestander going up, it's a Rohn similar to a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00478.html (8,243 bytes)

2. [Towertalk] Newbie Question (score: 1)
Author: ac7nj@bentonrea.com (ac7nj@bentonrea.com)
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 06:57:52 -0700
Troy, You have asked the biggest and most controversial questions in amateur radio. Money is normally the limiting factor. 7/8" heliax is over kill on HF it would be like using a Boing 747 for two pa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00479.html (9,861 bytes)

3. [Towertalk] Newbie Question (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider (N3RR))
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 10:31:47 -0400
Troy, Take a look at the station design outline and the detailed discussion on my website. While I designed a contest station, the process is the same for any application. You will learn a bunch from
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00483.html (10,368 bytes)

4. [Towertalk] Newbie Question (score: 1)
Author: RedHaines@centurytel.net (Red)
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 12:44:34 -0500
Troy; Normally I'd agree that heliax is overkill on HF, but suggest you check the attenuation of any coax, expecially on 10 and 15 meter. Ordinary RG-8 loses about 1.2-1.3 dB per 100 feet at 30 MHz.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00487.html (7,797 bytes)

5. [Towertalk] Newbie Question (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 14:01:08 -0400
But 75-ohm 3/4" CATV hardline is just a hair lossier than 7/8" Heliax at 30 MHz (.3-.35 dB/100 ft), can often be bought for free, and lends itself to inexpensive connector fabrication. 73, Pete N4ZR
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00488.html (8,369 bytes)

6. Fw: [Towertalk] Newbie Question (score: 1)
Author: NN7K@reno.rmci.net (NN7K@reno.rmci.net)
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 11:05:21 -0700
That 3 db (or so) comes to about 1/2 of a "S" unit- still not usually enough to make, or break you. and even it can be mitigated by preamp on the tower , in the recieve direction. signal would have t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00489.html (8,741 bytes)

7. Fw: [Towertalk] Newbie Question (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 18:58:21 -0400
3dB of transmitting power increase can sound like a major improvement to the other guy when signals are close to noise floor. As a general rule feedline loss, like antenna gain, is unimportant for r
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00491.html (9,318 bytes)

8. Fw: [Towertalk] Newbie Question (score: 1)
Author: NN7K@reno.rmci.net (NN7K@reno.rmci.net)
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 16:56:08 -0700
Tom, tho what you say is GENERALLY true, mught find this of interest- Am a 6 meter op for the most part (for 35 + years!) have little use for "DC" bands, however , on more than a few (started a coupl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00493.html (10,635 bytes)

9. [Towertalk] Newbie Question (score: 1)
Author: troy.flowers@wavecom-inc.com (Troy Flowers)
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 11:16:59 -0700
Ok I'm a relative newbie so I'll ask also. I ran 1/2" Heliax up my tower for HF. But 75 ohm CATV line can be used also? Being a cheapskate I'd much rather spend nothing so explain. My radio/amp wants
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00498.html (9,791 bytes)

10. [Towertalk] Newbie Question (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 08:02:44 -0400
Well, here's what I did. RG-213 from the antennas to the antenna switch. At the antenna switch (at the bottom of the tower) I switched to 75-ohm CATV, using a multiple of a half wavelength at the low
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00501.html (9,985 bytes)

11. [Towertalk] Newbie Question (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 06:32:58 -0600
There are several ways to use 75 Ohm CATV Hardline in 50 ohm systems. The simplest method is to use a multiple of 1/2 Wavelength (electrical) since impedances repeat every 1/2 WL in a transmission li
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00504.html (12,680 bytes)

12. Fw: [Towertalk] Newbie Question (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 22:45:43 -0400
p is Two or three extra dB does not require a substation when you do it with an amplifier, let alone less feedline loss. As for QRP, I have a different philosophy. I'm impressed by any station who ca
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00518.html (8,656 bytes)

13. Fw: [Towertalk] Newbie Question (score: 1)
Author: SPELUNK.SUENO@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR)
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 01:16:19 -0400
QRP DXCC = 100 pairs of good ears. 73 de Gene Smar AD3F --Original Message-- From: Tom Rauch <w8ji@contesting.com> To: Towertalk <Towertalk@contesting.com>; NN7K@reno.rmci.net <NN7K@reno.rmci.net> To
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00520.html (8,743 bytes)

14. Fw: [Towertalk] Newbie Question (score: 1)
Author: jreisert@jlc.net (Joe Reisert)
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 10:29:18 -0400
Gene, Whose ears must be good? Surely not the QRP station. In fact, if the DX station is weak, the QRP station will more than likely not get through. QRP requires a reasonable antenna system with lot
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00528.html (10,777 bytes)

15. Fw: [Towertalk] Newbie Question (score: 1)
Author: ve7hcb@rac.ca (Chris BONDE)
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 10:12:39 -0700
Methinks that a weak signal is relative, or in relation to something. I have heard some stations that others have not and vice versa. If your signal output is stronger than mine then I am a weak sign
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00531.html (9,002 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu