Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Parallel\s+wire\s+verticals\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Parallel\s+wire\s+verticals\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Parallel wire verticals (score: 1): Author: wb1dog@yahoo.com (Jim Apple); Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 12:32:19 -0700 (PDT); I've been considering building a BC Trapper (the wire version of the Battle Creek Special) But I got to wondering if I could skip the traps and run three wires in parallel with a single feed instead; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00733.html (7,050 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] Parallel wire verticals (score: 1): Author: wes@attawayinterests.com (Wes Attaway); Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:22:16 -0500; This would closely resemble the antenna I have been using for many years. What I use is an open-sleeve vertical consisting of three wires spaced about 4.5-inches. The center wire resonantes on 160 an; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00734.html (9,702 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] Parallel wire verticals (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 22:23:35 -0600; I once had a pair of inverted L's for 80 and 160 supported at 50 ft by a rope between two trees with the tails going in opposite directions. They were spaced several feet (5?) at the top and connecte; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00742.html (8,780 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]