- 1. [Towertalk] Quad's Do any stay up? (score: 1)
- Author: RCARIELLO@si.rr.com (RCARIELLO)
- Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 16:24:59 -0000
- Hello to all, To continue my information gathering for the new station in Florida. Nothing lasts forever. Are there any Quad mechanical design's that have proven themselves with the test of time. Wha
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00420.html (8,035 bytes)
- 2. [Towertalk] Quad's Do any stay up? (score: 1)
- Author: vk2lee@maxnet.net.au (Lee Noonan)
- Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 03:41:02 +1100
- YAGI'S 99% QUAD's 1% They always look flimsy.... and unless You can lower them to the ground when NOT in use... I don't think they have a very long life span... IMHO of course.... Hams I have known w
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00421.html (9,883 bytes)
- 3. [Towertalk] Quad's Do any stay up? (score: 1)
- Author: pa8dx@amsat.org (Jaap de Jonge)
- Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 21:22:09 +0100
- I suppose the degree of freedom for most quad's spreaders to move around, is too high. I'm sure there are quad's out there that are made to last. Have a look at some of the pictures by Giovannini (a
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00427.html (12,713 bytes)
- 4. [Towertalk] Quad's Do any stay up? (score: 1)
- Author: jaap.dejonge@hccnet.nl (Jaap de Jonge)
- Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 18:03:45 +0100
- I suppose the degree of freedom for most quad's spreaders to move = around, is too high. I'm sure there are quad's out there that are made to last. = Have a look at some of the pictures by Giovannini
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00444.html (12,347 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu