Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Re\:\s+\[ham\-law\]\s+Tower\s+height\s+regulations\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Re\:\s+\[ham\-law\]\s+Tower\s+height\s+regulations\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Re: [ham-law] Tower height regulations (score: 1): Author: WB9PKM@aol.com (WB9PKM@aol.com); Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 11:34:16 EDT; I would not read much into the lack of response on putting heights into zoning ordinances. Although I write ordinances for communities, I don't feel strongly about it one way or the other. Here in ce; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg01225.html (6,843 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]