Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Re\:Titanium\s+for\s+antennas\,\s+$was\s+Dayton\s+day\s+2$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Re\:Titanium\s+for\s+antennas\,\s+$was\s+Dayton\s+day\s+2$\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Re:Titanium for antennas, (was Dayton day 2) (score: 1): Author: jimlux@earthlink.net (Jim Lux); Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 08:45:26 -0700; corrode have Titanium is probably a non-optimal material for antennas... Depending on alloy, etc. it forms a fairly thick semiconductive oxide layer, unlike aluminum, where the oxide is a good insula; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00484.html (9,618 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]