Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Reflection\s+Gain\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Reflection\s+Gain\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Reflection Gain (score: 1): Author: jljarvis@abs.adelphia.net (jljarvis); Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 20:59:27 -0500; With due respect, Yuri....reflection gain exists for grazing incidence moonbounce signals. There is an additive behavior here, which recovers part of the signal which would be below the horizon, but; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00145.html (8,223 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] Reflection Gain (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 22:51:34 EST; So what you call it when I see increase in signal level when driving close to the ocean (good ground plane)? Negative attenuation? :-) What do you call increase in signals near ocean by 10 - 15 db? (; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00147.html (7,460 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] Reflection Gain (score: 1): Author: n4vi@arrl.net (Chris Adams); Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 21:11:22 -0700; Jim, I respectfully disagree with you. If the statement that reduced attenuation is caused by Seawater and not by signal reflection from the ground, then take the process to the ideal limits, free sp; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00148.html (10,061 bytes)
4. [Towertalk] Reflection Gain (score: 1): Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV); Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 23:32:51 -0500; Let's call that spectacularly reduced attenuation at low angles. If you haven't heard it come in driving up to and onto a saltwater beach with a mobile HF rig/whip, you've missed one of life's great; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00150.html (8,970 bytes)
5. [Towertalk] Reflection Gain (score: 1): Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV); Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 23:54:33 -0500; Another point. There is a bit of a double standard in being picky about that gain really being elimination of attenuation. Say you have a trap beam with a lossy trap that measures 3 dbd gain, and you; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00151.html (10,321 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Reflection Gain (score: 1): Author: kr6c@juno.com (Charles R Constantine); Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1998 19:26:16 PDT; I have read several articles and books including Walters W2DU Reflections and ARRL Antenna book and they all basically say the same thing. The enlargement of the forward power or the re-reflection of; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00242.html (7,596 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Reflection Gain (score: 1): Author: Guy Olinger, K2AV" <k2av@qsl.net (Guy Olinger, K2AV); Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1998 23:56:28 -0400; Hi, I believe the confusion lies in the use of "gain" in an esoteric term, rather than to describe something which makes us louder than the other guy in a pileup. Reflection Gain is apparent gain (ma; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00245.html (10,805 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] Reflection Gain (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 10:48:03 -0400; Hi Chuck This whole thing has gone beyond useful. It is as much "reflection gain" as the mistermination is "reflection loss". Reflection loss does not REALLY mean you have that amount of loss except; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00253.html (8,732 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] Reflection Gain (score: 1): Author: n7rt@doitnow.com (Hardy Landskov); Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 18:51:13 -0700; Hi Everyone, I will be brief. Current day transceivers are designed for a 50 ohm output. If there are reflections on your transmission line, that reflected power ends up being dissipated as heat at t; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00270.html (8,336 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]