- 1. [Towertalk] Service drop danger (score: 1)
- Author: davidgreer73@yahoo.com (David Greer)
- Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 05:45:13 -0800 (PST)
- Every ounce of my safety-conscious brain tells me not to run one leg of a proposed 80-meter full-wave horizontal loop above the service drop coming to my residence from the power lines along the back
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00228.html (7,506 bytes)
- 2. [Towertalk] Service drop danger (score: 1)
- Author: RedHaines@centurytel.net (Red)
- Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 10:31:47 -0600
- Hi, David; I believe you are correct. Check the National Electrical Code, you can review it in your local library, and call the utility company for authoritative information. Don't depend completely
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00230.html (8,799 bytes)
- 3. [Towertalk] Service drop danger (score: 1)
- Author: clewis@knology.net (Chuck Lewis)
- Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 11:39:22 -0600
- Dave, Check out the cost of converting to underground service. I had the same decision to make several years ago and found that the I could rent a Ditch Witch and dig the trench myself, thus greatly
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00235.html (9,412 bytes)
- 4. [Towertalk] Service drop danger (score: 1)
- Author: n2rd@arrl.net (Rajiv Dewan, N2RD)
- Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 13:16:08 -0500
- There is yet another possibility that may allow you to "eat the cake and have it too." The idea is to construct the 80m loop in two section on either side of the service line and connect the two halv
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00236.html (8,992 bytes)
- 5. [Towertalk] Service drop danger (score: 1)
- Author: n8de@thepoint.net (Don Havlicek)
- Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 13:19:57 -0500
- Have the utility BURY the service .. and put up BOTH loops! Don N8DE
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00237.html (8,495 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu