Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Tower\s+and\s+Tower\s+Party\s+Pics\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Tower\s+and\s+Tower\s+Party\s+Pics\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Tower and Tower Party Pics (score: 1): Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden); Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 00:03:52 -0600; Hey gang, If anyone cares or is interested in pictures of my tower and the corresponding tower party from last fall, it's now up on my website at the following link: www.qsl.net/na9d/QTH/hamshack.htm; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00254.html (7,244 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] Tower and Tower Party Pics (score: 1): Author: on4kj@skynet.be (on4kj); Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 10:49:13 -0000; Hello Jon, Had a look at your tower pictures. Very interesting, but I should say lucky fellow having that much help from other......... Happy 2k3 to all of you. Jos on4kj at; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00255.html (8,701 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] Tower and Tower Party Pics (score: 1): Author: ww3s@zoominternet.net (WW3S); Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:33:32 -0500; two climbers (plus ginpole and beam) at the top of unguyed 25g?? normal?? at; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00271.html (8,640 bytes)
4. [Towertalk] Tower and Tower Party Pics (score: 1): Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden); Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:54:23 -0600; The tower was (and is) guyed at 25 feet (so noted on the page). So, in reality, they were less than 30 feet above the first set of guys. Clearly w/in specs. I had to un-guy the tower and correct the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00273.html (7,633 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]