Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+WHY\?\!\!\!\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] WHY?!!! (score: 1)
Author: k6rix@arrl.net (Dino Darling)
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 19:56:21 -0800
I need your help! After a short rant, you will understand my frustration and possibly be able to educate me... I want to build a VHF antenna out of 1/2 copper pipe. I have 2 designs I'm working with
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00676.html (9,026 bytes)

2. [Towertalk] WHY?!!! (score: 1)
Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 00:27:56 -0500
1. This antenna is one of the all time classics. Strictly speaking what you call the main radiator is really TWO items. The radiation essentially gets done by the part of the piece which has nothing
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00677.html (12,634 bytes)

3. [Towertalk] WHY?!!! (score: 1)
Author: dhearn@ix.netcom.com (dan hearn)
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 22:23:39 -0800
Hi Dino: Your questions are certainly reasonable. 1. I do not believe dimension D is a critical one. The 1/4 wave open transmission line tap point for a transmission line match might be at a slightly
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00678.html (11,569 bytes)

4. [Towertalk] WHY?!!! (score: 1)
Author: shr@ricc.net (W0UN--John Brosnahan)
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 09:05:42 -0600
I sent this to Dino directly late last night--but I was reluctant to send it to Towertalk for a number of reasons. It was totally unedited--not even reread (still hasn't been) and I was tired last ni
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00680.html (19,175 bytes)

5. [Towertalk] WHY?!!! (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 11:20:32 -0500
I think the only thing I would add to John and Guy's explanations is that, considering he's working at 144 MHz, I doubt there is any broadbanded 4:1 commercial balun that will do the job -- the 1/2 w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00682.html (7,107 bytes)

6. [Towertalk] WHY?!!! (score: 1)
Author: mike@hatzakis.net (Michael Hatzakis, Jr)
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 07:37:52 -0800 (PST)
I have a very simple peice of feedback, having not fully absorbed all the details of all the responses thus far. But, my own advice, if you are going to invest the time testing, experimenting and bui
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00722.html (20,963 bytes)

7. [Towertalk] WHY?!!! (score: 1)
Author: K4BEV@aol.com (K4BEV@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2002 16:38:23 EST
Personally, I don't think anyone could argue against Michael on this. OnTheOtherHand : These instruments are pretty expensive. If you don't have the $$ right now you can get by with a Grid Dip Meter.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00733.html (7,576 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu