Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+modeling\s+info\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+modeling\s+info\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] modeling info (score: 1): Author: k2hk@arrl.net (Howard Klein); Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 23:13:42 +0000; Would it be totally ridiculous for antenna manufacturers to supply the modeling data for their antennas? It sure would be a nice starting point for comparison. Howard K2HK ___________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00548.html (7,392 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] modeling info (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 19:50:19 EDT; for I don't think you'll find any takers for companies to give away designs that they're in some cases heavily invested in. Cheers, Steve K7LXC TOWER TECH; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00551.html (7,398 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] modeling info (score: 1): Author: KI7WX@aol.com (KI7WX@aol.com); Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 20:11:08 -0400; They do. My personal experience has been that M2, Force-12, and Bencher have all responded very quickly and positively to my requests for either models, or model data, for comparison purposes and/or; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00555.html (7,475 bytes)
4. [Towertalk] modeling info (score: 1): Author: Kenneth Hirschberg" <info@cal-av.com (Kenneth Hirschberg); Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 17:45:42 -0700; Howard and all: No, it is not ridiculous. It is quite useful for comparisons. We believe that a potential customer who is in the market for a serious antenna (at a serious price) is entitled to full; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00558.html (8,810 bytes)
5. [Towertalk] modeling info (score: 1): Author: RedHaines@centurytel.net (Red); Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 20:01:40 -0500; A few years ago, I had money to spend and asked for info for modeling with ELNEC. AEA responded with data and hints. A prominent, but surviving antenna seller insisted his antennas were the very best; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00560.html (8,189 bytes)
6. [Towertalk] modeling info (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 21:08:11 -0400; ARRL invited manufacturers to include gain and pattern claims in their ads, if they would supply NEC-4 modeling data to substantiate them. Nobody did. 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the World HF Contest Sta; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00561.html (7,535 bytes)
7. [Towertalk] modeling info (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 22:51:47 -0400; Tom Frenaye points out that M2 did submit modeling data for some of their antennas, and were allowed to run gain figures in their ads. He's right, and I apologize for being over-categorical. I found; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00565.html (7,566 bytes)
8. [Towertalk] modeling info (score: 1): Author: llindblom@juno.com (llindblom@juno.com); Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 14:23:13 GMT; Unfortunately this is true of many things in life. Sort of like some of the people you work with who are incompetent but have a way of saying the buzz phrases that impresses others. But, in the end o; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00574.html (8,488 bytes)
9. [Towertalk] modeling info (score: 1): Author: k2hk@arrl.net (Howard Klein); Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 17:57:41 +0000; Thanks to all those who answered my question. It appears there is some hope for fair comparison..especially from the more ethical antenna manufacturers. I would think that if you have the goods ther; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00595.html (7,965 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]