Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Big\,\s+heavy\s+mast\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Big\,\s+heavy\s+mast\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Big, heavy mast (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1996 00:38:18 -0400; Hi Steve. Could you please send this out over the tower reflector. My mail handler can not, for some reason, cope with the reflectors. Keeps sending them back to me as undeliverable. I would apprecia; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-06/msg00136.html (8,827 bytes)
2. Big, heavy mast (score: 1): Author: thompson@mindspring.com (David L. Thompson); Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1996 11:32:52 -0400; DO NOT USE ANT TYPE OF WATER PIPE FOR LONG MASTS! Schedule 40 or 80 are not designed to handle antennas in strong bending moments caused by wind. No matter how big it appears it will bend! I used sc; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-06/msg00143.html (7,673 bytes)
3. Big, heavy mast (score: 1): Author: sawyers@cacd.rockwell.com (sawyers); Date: Wed, 19 Jun 96 13:36:54 cst; (begin freebie plug) I have just finished a paper about mast loading and mast strength for the Central States VHF/UHF meeting in Minneapolis around the end of July. I won't be able to present it due; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-06/msg00146.html (11,157 bytes)
4. Big, heavy mast (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1996 18:31:18 -0400; Dave is correct. Weight does not equal strength. Schedule 80 or water pipe of any kind is designed to carry liquids and is not rated for strength. Refer to Stan, W7NI's, article regarding masts that; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-06/msg00149.html (7,744 bytes)
5. Re[4]: Big, heavy mast (score: 1): Author: sawyers@cacd.rockwell.com (sawyers); Date: Fri, 21 Jun 96 08:00:44 cst; A direct hit by a tornado is one of those "Acts of God" that you can't engineer against, like having a plane fly into your tower. We had a local occurence where a plane hit a guy wire on 700' tower.; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-06/msg00164.html (8,620 bytes)
6. Big, heavy mast (score: 1): Author: w7ni@teleport.com (Stan Griffiths); Date: Sat, 22 Jun 1996 16:34:53 -0700 (PDT); Hi Steve, You can calculate exactly how safe using this mast will be. To do it, however, you absolutley must have certain pieces of critical data about the mast and the loads distributed on it. I wr; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-06/msg00168.html (11,573 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]