Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*C\-3\s+vs\s+KT\-34XA\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*C\-3\s+vs\s+KT\-34XA\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. C-3 vs KT-34XA (score: 1): Author: grhosler1@mmm.com (grhosler1@mmm.com); Date: Wed, 15 Jan 1997 15:57:00 -0600; How about a comparison of the C-3XL to the KT-34XA. 33 vs 32 foot boom length, both tribanders, etc.. Still hard for me to believe that the 5BA can beat out the C-3XL as the XL is optimized for 10M,; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-01/msg00331.html (7,718 bytes)
2. C-3 vs KT-34XA (score: 1): Author: fisher@hp-and2.an.hp.com (Tony Brock-Fisher); Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1997 09:12:08 -0500; The C3-XL is three element monos on a single boom. They are forward staggered to prevent pattern degradation. As such, none of the 3 monos can lay claim to the entire boom length. -Tony, K1KP, fisher; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-01/msg00345.html (6,766 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]