Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Hello\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Hello\!\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Hello! (score: 1): Author: fisher@hp-and2.an.hp.com (Tony Brock-Fisher); Date: Mon, 3 Jun 1996 08:49:57 -0400; Greetings, other tower-monkeys! I'll introduce myself to the new reflector with a question: Does anyone manufacture a self-supporting climbable rotating tower section for use as a mast? I remember a; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-06/msg00004.html (7,104 bytes)
2. Hello! (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Mon, 3 Jun 1996 10:14:48 -0400; Hi, Tony -- Glad to see you made it back from Dayton. Enjoyed meeting you and thanks for the talk at the contest forum. I've seen a couple of 'tower-as-mast' schemes and mostly they were flat top sec; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-06/msg00005.html (7,897 bytes)
3. Hello! (score: 1): Author: fisher@hp-and2.an.hp.com (Tony Brock-Fisher); Date: Mon, 3 Jun 1996 11:40:49 -0400; Steve Actually, I think the back-to-back bearings, and the mast between them, would have to support the full moment from the antennas and tower sections above - enough so that I'd be reluctant to cli; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-06/msg00007.html (6,908 bytes)
4. Hello! (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Mon, 3 Jun 1996 12:25:47 -0400; Okay, Tony -- IMO if you use a high strength (100K psi or more) 2 or even 3 inch mast secured with accessory shelves and thrust bearings, it would be very brute strong. The amount of tower would be a; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-06/msg00008.html (7,581 bytes)
5. Hello! (score: 1): Author: wb2nqt@usa.pipeline.com (Mark Sihlanick); Date: Mon, 3 Jun 1996 16:43:05 GMT; IIX sells a mast section that has ladder steps built into it. They advertise in the normal mags. For a rotating tower section look in the texas tower catalog, they have Dick Webers stuff in there for; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-06/msg00009.html (6,955 bytes)
6. Hello! (score: 1): Author: barry@w2up.wells.com (barry); Date: Mon, 03 Jun 96 10:40:31 EDT; I'll agree with the above. I've had my ringrotor up for about 2 years. Major problems were intial installation due to poor quality control (holes drilled about 1/4 off center in bracket where motor m; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-06/msg00010.html (7,855 bytes)
7. Hello! (score: 1): Author: ky1h@berkshire.net (David Robbins); Date: Mon, 03 Jun 1996 20:31:37 +0000; just so you don't think they are all bad.. i have had a 1032 ring up for 5 or 6 years turning either a 40-2cd or now a 4 ele 20m telrex. the only problem i have had was with the phenolic rollers comi; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-06/msg00012.html (8,447 bytes)
8. Hello! (score: 1): Author: barry@w2up.wells.com (barry); Date: Mon, 03 Jun 96 14:47:14 EDT; Steve - I was going to bring up the sidemount issue, but didn't. SInce you did, let me ask you this: The torque introduced by a sidearm with a mid-sized Yagi seems to be quite a bit. I don't recall s; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-06/msg00018.html (7,540 bytes)
9. Hello! (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Tue, 4 Jun 1996 11:36:43 -0400; Hi, Barry -- I don't recall offhand seeing any sidemount forces in the Rohn book specifically relating to sidemounted antennas. I'll wade through it again if I get a chance. The best analysis of side; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-06/msg00019.html (7,542 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]