Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Hygain\s+52\'\s+Crankup\s+\-\s+good\s+for\s+me\?\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Hygain 52' Crankup - good for me? (score: 1)
Author: fisher@hp-and2.an.hp.com (Tony Brock-Fisher)
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 1996 08:37:21 -0400
Scott I have one concern about adding much of a mast to the setup - even when cranked down, the mast will add to the overturning moment, reducing the structural capacity below what the manufacturer c
/archives//html/Towertalk/1996-07/msg00004.html (12,749 bytes)

2. Hygain 52' Crankup - good for me? (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 1996 10:13:01 -0400
XA comes out >4-8 dB better in the forward gain department. 4 dB is 60% of the power. Tony -- Intertesting post. Not being an engineer has its disadvantages but I understand that the TOTAL gain of an
/archives//html/Towertalk/1996-07/msg00005.html (9,450 bytes)

3. Hygain 52' Crankup - good for me? (score: 1)
Author: fisher@hp-and2.an.hp.com (Tony Brock-Fisher)
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 1996 10:34:30 -0400
Steve 1. The numbers I'm talking about do equate to 8-10 dB total gain for the XA, which is their published spec, and which is not unrealistic for an antenna with a boom length of .5 lambda, which is
/archives//html/Towertalk/1996-07/msg00006.html (9,117 bytes)

4. Hygain 52' Crankup - good for me? (score: 1)
Author: barry@w2up.wells.com (barry)
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 96 11:21:17 EDT
Steve has a TH7, which per Tony, is 1 db better than the C3. Why is it a good move to swap it, if the TH7 is a better performer? My 2 TH7s have performed flawlessly, electrically and mechanically, si
/archives//html/Towertalk/1996-07/msg00008.html (7,576 bytes)

5. Hygain 52' Crankup - good for me? (score: 1)
Author: neader@centuryinter.net (Scott Neader)
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 1996 18:12:48 -0500
Been in my first home for one year now and still no tower in the air. I want to put one up, but don't have a lot of room in the back yard. The idea of a self-supporting system really sounds good. I w
/archives//html/Towertalk/1996-06/msg00193.html (7,875 bytes)

6. Hygain 52' Crankup - good for me? (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@cais.cais.com (Bill Hider)
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 1996 21:47:41 -0400
Hi Scott! You are where I was in 1985!! Here's what I did: I put up a HG-52SS with a Cushcraft A-4S (w/40M element) on 5 ft mast. So, the A-4S was at 55 ft. That worked WONDERFULLY WELL! I also had a
/archives//html/Towertalk/1996-06/msg00194.html (10,893 bytes)

7. Hygain 52' Crankup - good for me? (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@cais.cais.com (Bill Hider)
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 1996 22:17:48 -0400
Hi Scott! You are where I was in 1985!! Here's what I did: I put up a HG-52SS with a Cushcraft A-4S (w/40M element) on 5 ft mast. So, the A-4S was at 55 ft. That worked WONDERFULLY WELL! I also had a
/archives//html/Towertalk/1996-06/msg00195.html (10,903 bytes)

8. Hygain 52' Crankup - good for me? (score: 1)
Author: JKAHRS@delphi.com (JKAHRS@delphi.com)
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 1996 22:54:49 -0500 (EST)
On 28-JUN-1996 20:43:31.3 neader said to JKAHRS <snip> Scott, I have one of the early 52SS twrs ...circa 1981, I have moved it three times leaving my monument to ham radio at each QTH...the concrete
/archives//html/Towertalk/1996-06/msg00196.html (8,066 bytes)

9. Hygain 52' Crankup - good for me? (score: 1)
Author: kr2j@ix.netcom.com (Robert E. Naumann)
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 1996 07:31:46 -0500
years old now and quite rusty. << You better watch out for the "wench". She may not appreciate your comments. 73, KR2J@ix.netcom.com River Vale, NJ (for a couple of days)
/archives//html/Towertalk/1996-06/msg00197.html (7,119 bytes)

10. Hygain 52' Crankup - good for me? (score: 1)
Author: seay@alaska.net (Del & Jan Seay)
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 1996 06:52:15 -0700
Trade ya' - mine isn't rusty, but she's all spawned out! de KL7HF
/archives//html/Towertalk/1996-06/msg00198.html (7,068 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu