Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*MAST\s+STRENGTH\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Mast Strength (score: 1)
Author: abowen@nettally.com (Bowen, Arlan)
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 1996 09:38:38 -0500
I am erecting a quad antenna at the top of a Rohn 45, tilt over tower. To clear the top guy wires, I need to extend the mast some 6-7 feet above the top of the tower. The mast I intended to use is a
/archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00008.html (7,973 bytes)

2. Mast Strength (score: 1)
Author: broz@csn.net (John Brosnahan)
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 1996 10:14:27 -0600
Without knowing the exact material it is impossible to say for sure. But if one makes an assumption that the yield strength of the material is 60,000 psi then the survivability of the mast is 70.4 mp
/archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00013.html (9,334 bytes)

3. Mast Strength (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 1996 12:40:55 -0500
Hi, Ink -- You want the bad news or the good news first? The bad news is that you are in a 100 MPH TIA-222 wind zone AND within 100 miles of hurrican oceanline so you need to use 100 MPH values for y
/archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00015.html (8,902 bytes)

4. Mast Strength (score: 1)
Author: fisher@hp-and2.an.hp.com (Tony Brock-Fisher)
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 1996 12:56:31 -0500
Based on: I'd say NO!!!!! (hint: how do you spell h-u-r-r-i-c-a-i-n-e)? -Tony, K1KP, fisher@hp-and2.an.hp.com -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contest
/archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00016.html (7,395 bytes)

5. Mast Strength (score: 1)
Author: dave@egh.com (dave@egh.com)
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 1996 14:03:49 EST
Hi, In the past, there have been a lot of comments about not using water pipe as a mast. I don't want to be unnecessarily argumentative, but those comments do not agree with my experience. So, since
/archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00020.html (9,051 bytes)

6. Fwd: Mast Strength (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 1996 17:20:31 -0500
Nay Nay Steve, the M200 is too light weight. He needs at least an M200H which is .125 wall. 73 Bill K5FUV -- From: K7LXC To: abowen Cc: towertalk Subject: Re: Mast Strength To: <towertalk@contesting.
/archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00024.html (10,874 bytes)

7. Mast Strength (score: 1)
Author: n4si@techinter.com (n4si)
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 1996 22:44:38 +0000
-- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: K7LXC@contesting.com Sponsored b
/archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00027.html (9,603 bytes)

8. Mast Strength (score: 1)
Author: weightdn@bright.net (Mike Rhodes)
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 1996 20:37:58 -0500
No idea about the specs but seem to remember a recent post about a significant load an appreciable distance above the top of a tilt-over tower and the bad things that happened because of it as it was
/archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00032.html (12,815 bytes)

9. Mast Strength (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 1996 12:27:03 -0500
Hi, Dave -- You post made me real nervous. You are lucky. No, let me rephrase that. You are DAMN lucky. It just goes to show that everytime you speed you don't get a speeding ticket either. You have
/archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00044.html (9,116 bytes)

10. MAST STRENGTH (score: 1)
Author: rthorne@ibm.net (Richard Thorne - WB5M)
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 1996 09:42:32 -0700
How do you go about determining how much antenna (square foot wise) you can safely put on a mast. I know theres an article in NCJ a while back explaining this but its in storage somewhere. I have an
/archives//html/Towertalk/1996-07/msg00132.html (6,405 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu