Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*OPINIONS\s+ON\s+KT\-34A\s+BEAMS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*OPINIONS\s+ON\s+KT\-34A\s+BEAMS\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. OPINIONS ON KT-34A BEAMS (score: 1): Author: pash@iag.net (paul ash); Date: Sun, 21 Jul 1996 21:45:09 -0400; Hello! I am considering picking up a new beam in the next few months and I was wondering if there are any KT-34A users out there who could give me there opinion on the antenna. I am planning on putti; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-07/msg00137.html (6,627 bytes)
2. OPINIONS ON KT-34A BEAMS (score: 1): Author: pash@iag.net (paul ash); Date: Mon, 22 Jul 1996 20:03:33 -0400; My thanks to all who responded to my query regarding KT-34A beams. For those who may have an interest in the antenna the results are as follows: 1. High forward gain, so-so F/B and side to side. 2. V; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-07/msg00142.html (7,091 bytes)
3. OPINIONS ON KT-34A BEAMS (score: 1): Author: wa2syn@li.net (Jeff Singer); Date: Mon, 22 Jul 1996 22:20:54 -0400 (EDT); Paul - I love 'em! The 4-el beam is a great performer, especially on 10 mtrs. I am abt to put up my third KLM in the next month or so (xa) and while a lot of guys would disagree, I think the KLM is t; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-07/msg00144.html (7,638 bytes)
4. OPINIONS ON KT-34A BEAMS (score: 1): Author: shueyj@epix.net (shueyj@epix.net); Date: Tue, 23 Jul 1996 22:32:15 -0700; thanks de joe NE3H; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-07/msg00152.html (8,001 bytes)
5. OPINIONS ON KT-34A BEAMS (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 03:12:15 -0400; The performance of the KT34A (the half-boom version of the KT34XA) is approximately like other similar trapped, tribanders of similar boom length (16 feet). It doesn't perform appreciably better than; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-07/msg00163.html (7,250 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]