Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ROHN\s+25G\s+QUIERY\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ROHN\s+25G\s+QUIERY\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. ROHN 25G QUIERY (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Fri, 13 Dec 1996 11:34:52 -0500; Hi, Mick -- You're correct, Bedford County is a 70 MPH zone - the lowest rating in the TIA-222. While I'm all in favor of over-engineering towers and antennas, the added guy tension will be a detrime; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00191.html (8,160 bytes)
2. ROHN 25G QUIERY (score: 1): Author: n4zr@ix.netcom.com (Pete Smith); Date: Fri, 13 Dec 1996 10:33:52 -0800; Steve -- I have the torque bars on the top two guy locations of my 100' 25G, and I can't see that they do any good at all. One of the guys on the reflector (sorry, I can't recall right now who it was; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00195.html (7,570 bytes)
3. ROHN 25G QUIERY (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Fri, 13 Dec 1996 16:41:17 -0500; Hi, Pete -- To cut to the chase, you're right - they don't do much. When Rohn went to one of the new past revisions of TIA-222, they re-calculated the torsion resistance of the (let's call them the o; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00202.html (9,513 bytes)
4. ROHN 25G QUIERY (score: 1): Author: w5hvv@aeneas.net (Rod Fitz-Randolph); Date: Sun, 15 Dec 1996 22:07:24 -0600; This isn't a flame, Steve, but I don't understand how something "inline" with the guys can do much to prevent twisting as opposed to a 6 foot 2" steel angle that is guyed at right angles to the angle; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00233.html (8,969 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]