Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Years\s+of\s+use\s+on\s+coax\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Years\s+of\s+use\s+on\s+coax\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Years of use on coax (score: 1): Author: nx1g@top.monad.net (Craig Clark); Date: Tue, 15 Oct 1996 19:52:03 -0500; Here's one I haven't seen yet. What's best case number of years coax is good outside. I'm using one from my Novice days (30 years ago) and it seems to be OK, measuring power. Main run to big tower is; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-10/msg00188.html (7,386 bytes)
2. Years of use on coax (score: 1): Author: seay@alaska.net (Jan & Del Seay); Date: Tue, 15 Oct 1996 17:52:30 -0700; Craig: There is no "rule-of-thumb" for determining throw-away age of RG-8. What happens to coax is called contamination. No contamination, it's good for a long-long time. If a lot of effort was put i; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-10/msg00193.html (7,649 bytes)
3. Years of use on coax (score: 1): Author: fisher@hp-and2.an.hp.com (Tony Brock-Fisher); Date: Wed, 16 Oct 1996 08:48:19 -0400; I'd just go by the measured loss, not age. The condition of coax is a function of environment, including UV exposure, temperature and humidity extremes, chemical environment (pH, acid rain, bug spray; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-10/msg00200.html (7,003 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]